My maid sees everything. Unlike my Mum, who spent hours cleaning up the place before the maid arrived (afraid that the maid would see how we really lived), I simply don’t have the time to worry about it. I was raised in the “liberated” era, so I don’t have as many old-school inhibitions, or neurotic social fears concerning what the rest of the world thinks. I’m a single mom with a career and a boyfriend (translation: sex life), and I work hard and love my kids, so caring what the neighbors or anyone else’s opinions are is decidedly low on my list of concerns.Don’t get me wrong, I would never let anyone I didn’t trust completely to be privy to my life or my home, so I am happy to say that I trust my maid completely. I’ve used the same service (and the same maid) for several years now, since my divorce, when I was forced to go back to work. I love my job but there is no way I can attend to my career, find time to cook for and take care of my kids and have a social life without some help in keeping the home clean and tidy.One of the things I did learn from my Mum, and that I’m eternally grateful for, was her advice in hiring a maid service. “Don’t hire a maid without checking her references!”, she instructed me in a stern tone, and for once, I followed her advice. I talked to several maid services before I made a choice, and I found one with a long list of references and a fully-trained staff. I followed up on the references and learned that the company has been providing trusted domestic cleaning for over a decade. The maid they provided proved to be friendly, efficient and completely trustworthy. Now, I can’t imagine life without her.If you’re considering hiring a domestic cleaning service, take my Mum’s sage advice and find one that has a proven track record. For domestic cleaning London offers many choices – make sure you hire the right one. I trust mine with my cleaning, my valuables and my dirty lingerie.
Doesn’t the Sixteenth Amendment prevent the IRS from owning us?The Sixteenth Amendment does not let the IRS own you otherwise the whole Constitution is a meaningless document. The Founding Fathers did not allow for a direct capitation tax on people which would turn their Founding Children into serfs and the Sixteenth Amendment proves this. AND don’t tell me about paying some Fair Share either because you will never finds these words or even this sentiment expressed anywhere in OUR Constitution. You will however find it expressed in the 2nd Plank of the 10 Plank Communist Manifesto, and that tells you precisely what it should tell you.The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes ON Incomes, FROM Whatever Source DERIVED, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration (my emphasis)I am Richard Brown circa June of 1941 and a former US Marine. I took an oath to protect this country against ALL enemies both Foreign AND Domestic. It was thought silly back in 1960 because we had no idea what a Domestic Enemy was, no not a Domestic Terrorist but a Domestic Enemy. Today we know that definition to mean those who try to subvert Our Constitution. Some obvious Domestic Enemies of the Constitution today are surely the ones Scamming you on the Wording of the Sixteenth Amendment.Even this second adjectival phrase “from whatever source derived,” is a blatantly obvious effort to deceive you by placing the verb at the end of the phrase. They knew that if they claimed they could tax “incomes, derived from any source,” it would be in the real English we all speak and then way to obvious that income derived from a source is could not possibly be your paycheck.The Sixteenth Amendment Slams the Writing of QuatloosQuatloos, a IRS pseudonym or at least writing on the Internet as such, and per their words ridicules and dismisses people and groups who Market and Sell a variety of information based on interpretations of the U.S. Constitution as it relates to the Internal Revenue Code, and indeed the Internal Revenue Service itself.But isn’t Quatloos really a perfect example of an ANTI-Constitution, ANTI-American Domestic Enemy because it just arrogantly discredits those who get it wrong. Quatloos makes no attempt to ever clarify people’s misconceptions like what an ethical Pro-Constitutional organization would do. Quatloos talks down to people by misdirecting every Query people have just like you’d typically see those do running a scam you’re starting to catch on to.Yes, most Patriots do get it wrong with what could be frivolous arguments. They intuitively know there shouldn’t be a way for our government to reach into our lives to confiscate a large part of our labor but not sure how to unravel the deception. Now we realize that it’s in the Sixteenth Amendment where the IRS gets ALL of its authority. If it isn’t found here, the IRS does not have it!I am asking everyone to read for themselves just how disingenuous, ANTI-American, and ANTI-Constitutional Quatloos sound, more like the Domestic Enemies of our Freedom we all swore to protect America from that day we all swore the Oath to become a US Marine.Can you tell when someone is Shucking & Jiving you?How about if it is as obvious as their statements below? Quatloos claims the arguments advanced by these groups include:Quatloos: False arguments that the 16th Amendment to the Constitution (authorizing the income tax) was not properly ratified.ANSWER: Actually, the Sixteenth Amendment probably was never properly ratified per the tremendous Research Bill Benson conducted over the years BUT so what? Sorry Bill, we don’t even have to go there because it doesn’t matter in the slightest to all those whose incomes which are not DERIVED FROM from whatever source.Quatloos: False arguments that the Internal Revenue Code was not properly enacted by Congress.ANSWER: Not even sure what Quatloos is mumbling about here because I have never heard this argument. If they’re implying that many are claiming that the IRS Code was never codified then this is true. The IRS Code was never codified as is clearly evident or it would be the IRS Law Book and not the IRS “Code” Book. As an attorney Quatloos should know this or he would have to be the dumbest lawyer to ever graduate Law School. Is he chewing gum while he writes his ridiculous statements? I wonder…When I was in the Marines I had to iron my shirts with three creases down the back. It was the Military Code but the second I was discharged I was no longer subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ.) Hence the reach of a Code – any Code, can only encompass those subject to that code. In Other Words, others who were NOT in the military were NOT subject to the Military Code therefore, some entity would have to first have Sixteenth Amendment Income that was DERIVED FROM whatever Source to then become subject to the IRS Code.You did know that US Title 27, Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms which some still confuse with US Title 26 IRS is Codified, right? AND therefore BATF is the Law and not just some Code. US Title 26 aka the IRS Code which was never Codified and will never be Codified so therefore can NOT be a Law. The IRS Code can ONLY apply to those subject to it because they had: you know, income DERIVED FROM a source, whatever source.Quatloos: False arguments that the Internal Revenue Service was not properly constituted by either Congress or the Department of the Treasury (and is therefore operating as an “illegal” entity)ANSWER: Many have come to know the IRS lately for their deception in the way they Shuck and Jive us into thinking that they have authority over “ALL” of our income, but we do agree they are certainly Legal. We know this because Congress made them Legal in the Sixteenth Amendment giving them the authority to collect a tax on Income providing that it was “DERIVED” “FROM” whatever source.Quatloos: False arguments that “income” cannot be defined, and therefore cannot be owed.ANSWER: Of course Income can be defined Mr. Quatloos AND was defined in the Corporate Excise Tax of 1909 some 4 years prior to the Sixteenth Amendment of 1913. But, it is NOT defined anywhere in the IRS Code Book. Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill denounced the U.S. income tax code as “9500 pages of gibberish.” Does it not bother anyone else that the IRS demands we all pay them a tax on Income but will NOT define Income anywhere? Would we even be having this disagreement if they simply put a definition for income in their Code Book? Or do they purposely avoid the definition because it would just admit they have no authority over our Colloquial Termed Income aka paycheck?Income is also defined in every dictionary to mean something coming in. BUT the Sixteenth Amendment did not tax income; it taxed Income FROM whatever Source DERIVED or Income DERIVED FROM whatever Source. Changing where we place the verb “DERIVED” in the adjectival Phrase does NOT in any way eliminate the word “FROM” from the phrase! Therefore, the Sixteenth Amendment can ONLY Tax Income if it’s “DERIVED” “FROM” a Source, whatever Source.Quatloos: False arguments that only foreigners and citizens of the United States (falsely limited to citizens of the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, etc.) are liable to pay income tax, and state citizens are not liable for income tax — i.e., false arguments that the payment of income tax is really “voluntary” (you’d have to be a real sucker to believe this one.)WOW,ANSWER: Quatloos travels real far down this ANTI-American, ANTI-Constitutional path to come out as the top Domestic Enemy of all that Freedom Bequeathed to us in our Constitution by our Forefathers. If you fall for the Lies and Deception of Quatloos then you must also believe that the IRS totally owns you to take whatever it wants from your labor and our Sixteenth Amendment now no longer exists.Yes Mr. Quatloos, the IRS Income tax is Voluntary!The IRS even prints this in their Literature (DUH!) How could you have not read this? AND the reason the IRS themselves admits their tax is voluntary is crystal clear. If you did have income that was DERIVED FROM whatever source like most profitable businesses, then a payment of tax to the IRS is Mandatory. BUT, if you had Colloquial Termed Income that was not DERIVED FROM whatever source, the Sixteenth Amendment does not give them authority and the IRS tax can be nothing but Voluntary.Another Embarrassing Problem Quatloos has with their Sixteenth Amendment LiesThe Sixteenth Amendment Income that was DERIVED FROM whatever Source can be a negative number, right? Especially today where many companies are not taking in enough revenue (Source) to cover their overhead thereby DERIVING a negative number (Loss) FROM that Source that no IRS tax is due on.So again, DERIVED Income can be a negative number where No tax would be due the IRS because as an example, 33% of a $15,000 loss or even 33% of a Million dollar loss for the year is still $0.00 owed the IRS. However, Colloquial Termed Income can NEVER be expressed as a negative number, right? Proving Colloquial Termed Income is an entirely different income.GE, the largest company in America had $5.1 Billion in profit for 2010 – Not sales = Profit. They paid absolutely no taxes on $5,100,000,000. They can write off everything to owe no tax but you can’t? A poorly run company can have a negative profit and owe no taxes but you can’t?Therefore I don’t believe Sixteenth Amendment Tax is Voluntary, I KNOW that it is. It is Voluntary for all of us who ONLY receive Colloquial Termed IncomeQuatloos: False arguments about a number of like subjects regarding income tax, all of which erroneously conclude that nobody is liable to pay income tax.ANSWER: Doesn’t this rambling sound like they are Domestic Enemies of our Constitution who just run out of more Lies and Innuendos? OK, one more time, nice and slow for those at Quatloos who would appear to be reading the Sixteenth Amendment on a 4 year old Pre-K level.Any Income DERIVED FROM whatever Source would attach Sixteenth Amendment LiabilityAny Colloquial Termed Income not DERIVED FROM whatever Source would NOT attach Sixteenth Amendment LiabilityIf you Google the Sixteenth Amendment, you’ll find all kinds of Domestic Enemies of our America and our Constitution who quote the Sixteenth Amendment as the Amendment that gave Congress the right to tax income without apportionment…Yeah Right…Can they just leave out an adjectival Phrase and not show that America is surrounded by ANTI-American, ANTI-Constitutional Domestic Enemies who will try to dumb you down to an uneducated serf for the Federal Reserve Banking Families through the IRS Collection Agency by hiding the words “Derived From” from your sight and mind by OVERTLY Misquoting the very Constitutional Amendment that has you realize just how much of a FREE American you truly are.We’re losing too much money so on Friday everyone is going to be fired We’re losing too much money so on Friday everyone FROM temp services is going to be fired. “FROM” is probably the most powerful word in the entire English Language because it removes all ambiguity from it’s noun.